인셀랩(InSellLab)

The world's first Bigdata report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- individual)

심재우-에스비컨설팅 2017. 1. 5. 00:32

The world's first Bigdata report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- individual)

 

January 2, 2017

 

Jaiwoo Shim

(President of SB Consulting & Creator of Inselllab Business Capability Assessment Solution)

 

 

We quantitatively diagnosed and analyzed Bigdata of the business ability of Korean employees during 6 months.

This is the world's first public release of the amazing results from the "Inselllab Business Capability Assessment Project".

 

 

In this report, we have divided and analyzed 60 business specific areas of six business types of Korean employees, and obtained various results and statistical data. It is a report full of implications and insights.

 

Among the hundreds of participants who participated in the assessment of business ability, there were 6 ability Assessment types (Workforce & project execution ability / communication & persuasion ability / creativity & collaboration ability / leadership & Coaching ability / problem solving & meeting facilitation ability / Strategic Thinking Ability)

The data are analyzed based on the data of the individuals who took the top 20 and the results are analyzed. In the 2nd ~ 6th reports, data and statistical results analyzed by level, department, industry, grade and experience period.

 

 

No. 1 - The world's first report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- individual)

No. 2 - The world's first report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- job title)

No. 3 - The world's first report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- department)

No. 4 - The world's first report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- industry)

No. 5 - The world's first report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- ranking)

No. 6 - The world's first report on the level of business capability of Korean employees (#1- job experience)

 

 

The statistical data of this report did not disclose the applicant's real name for the protection of applicant’s information.

 

The contents is as follows.

[A. Results of the INSELLLAB Business Capability Assessment Project]

1. Average Score of Top 20

2. The average score distribution of the Top 20 in each assessment type

3. Trends in Average scores of the Top 20 Assessment Sectors

4. Distribution of the detailed average score of the top 5 in six types of Assessment

5. Top 20 box plot graph

6. The average score change of the Top 20 in 6 Ability Assessment Types

7. Average Score Distribution of the Top 20 by 6 Ability Assessment Types

[B. Background of Inselllab business ability Assessment project]

[C. Inselllab Business Capability Assessment Individual Portfolio Report]

[D. Conclusion]


 

 

[A. Results of the INSELLLAB Business Capability Assessment Project]

The results of analyzing the Big Data (Smart Data) that have been diagnosed and collected through the Inselllab Business Skill Assessment Project for several months are as follows. The following are the results of the world's first and most significant conclusions and lessons learned and shared. .

 

This ability Assessment was conducted through the online site of INSELLAB(www.inselllab.com), and the collected Big data were selected for their purpose and classified into six types.

 

 

 

Applicants' individual diagnoses are also provided at Inselllab website. In this report, we analyzed directly using the desktop version of Tableau, a data visualization tool, for more diverse and diverse analyzes.


 

1. Average Score of Top 20

Table 1 below shows the results of selecting 20 individuals who participated in the Assessment Project and who took the highest score in all 6 competency Assessment types.

The average score of all six assessment applicants ranged from a maximum of 65.33 to a minimum of 37.

The average of all applicants was 50.6 and the average of Top 20 was 56.

 

 

 

2. The average score distribution of the Top 20 in each assessment type

Table 2 below shows the average for the six assessment types. The higher the score, the lower the score difference for each type of Assessment.

The average of the top 1 to 3 people did not rank all in all six areas, but showed various ranks according to the type.

The upper group recorded 50 ~ 80 points in most of the six types, 30 ~ 65 points in the middle group, and 20 ~ 60 points in the lower group. The middle and lower groups showed exceptionally weak areas because it is often the case that people belonging to this area will have to prioritize the development of skills in areas that are vulnerable to them.

 

 

 

3. Trends in Average of the Top 20 Assessment Sectors

Table 3 below shows the trends of the average of the top 20 subjects in the type of Assessment.

The average score of the applicant who obtained the highest score was significantly higher than the others.

However, the changes in the mean average of the assessment types showed similar patterns and did not show consistent patterns.

 

From the left to the right of the graph, there are "Leadership & coaching ability", "Problem solving & meeting facilitation ability", "Communication & persuasion ability", “Workforce & project execution ability”, “Strategic Thinking Ability “ and “Creativity & collaboration ability. The score in the circle indicates the average score recorded in each assessment type.

 

Applicants should develop their weak skills by referring to their level of scoring and patterns in their types and try to level them up. So, preferably, the shape of the average point distribution should be managed and tried to be a horizontal line.

Among the six assessment types, the average scores of "problem solving & meeting facilitation ability" and "creativity & collaboration ability" were relatively higher than those of other types.

  

 

 

 

 

 

4. Distribution of the detailed average score of the top 5 in six types of assessment

Table 4 shows the average graph of the top 5 of the applicants according to the Assessment type. In case 1, the score differs from the other 2 ~ 5 average distribution. The Top 1 is not the highest average point in each types, but it is 60 ~ 72 points in 6 types, and the deviation is relatively low with 12 points, while the top 2~5 are 28 points, 26 points, 22 points, 18 points relatively high deviation.

People in Top 5 have a good score in communication & persuasion, problem solving & meeting facilitation, creativity & collaboration, and have a relatively low score in strategic thinking and work & project performance.

Therefore, it is necessary for them to continue to maintain high-score areas while at the same time actively developing skills in vulnerable types.

 

 

 

5. Top 20 box plot graph

Table 5 shows the box plot graph of the average of the six assessment types, and shows the distribution of average. Inside the middle box means 50% of the total data (second quartile), and if the horizontal bar, called beard, is far from the box, it means that the data is spread widely.

By analyzing the table below, we will record the highest in “creativity & collaboration ability” averages based on the 20 applicants and show the lowest average in “strategic thinking ability”. The most widespread use of data emerged in the type of “communication & persuasion ability”. The fact that there is a lot of spread means that the assessment average of the applicants are large and there is a large variation in ability.

The lowest spreading assessments type shows the smallest variation among applicants due to the ability to perform in “workforce & projects execution ability”.

You can check the applicant's position in this graph, so you can find your ability level by checking the relative position.

 

 

 

6. The average score change of the Top 20 in 6 Ability Assessment Types

Table 6 shows the distribution of the average of the individuals in the Assessment type by which their relative positions and levels can be confirmed. This shows the box plot of Table 5 in a different form, which is advantageous in visually confirming the average distribution of all applicants.

The method of using this analysis graph is the same as described in Table 5.

 

 

7. Average Score Distribution of the Top 20 by 6 Ability Assessment Types

Table 7 shows the assessment results of the top 20 people in each of the six assessment types. The level and relative position can be confirmed through relative comparison with other applicant’s results.

 

 

 

 

B. Background of Inselllab business ability Assessment project]

In order to enter the university, you have to take the study ability test, which certifies your ability and level. American universities must also pass the entrance examination through the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). The entrance examination is a test that answers the various subjects correctly. If you have the ability, you will have a high qualification to enter the desired college. Sometimes it is one or two points lower than the competitors, so they fail to enter.

Meanwhile, when entering a company or corporate, they compete through university grades, self-introduction letters, and interviews. In recent years, they have also required credit, TOEIC, certification, competition awards, and language study. However, in a rapidly changing era of new ICT technology and the fourth industrial revolution driven by big data, industrial Internet and artificial intelligence, companies need to focus on business capabilities such as creativity, problem solving, communication skills, strategic thinking and collaboration. It is changing into an era of greater demand. So they select these business capabilities with the talent they want, ask their employees and job applicants, and hire and promote talented people.

However, business skills required by company’s talent are difficult to accurately measure or verify, making objective assessment and relative comparison impossible. As an alternative to this, if one employee is emotionally assessed by a supervisor, a colleague, a subordinate, or an applicant who is composed of the employee, he or she is dependent on the assessment. However, there is a strong doubt and resistance to the accuracy and fairness of evaluation and assessment because the multidimensional assessment is based on emotional and relationship - oriented evaluators because there is no clear standard nor criteria.

 

Inselllab business capability assessment solution is the world's first assessment solution to quantify and diagnose business competency across the organization and teams. While employee skill development, training, and performance management are important to the company's operations, there are not enough tools to manage them effectively, and often they rely on overseas solutions that do not fit the domestic situation. Inselllab Business Capability Assessment Solution is recognized for its innovative ability to objectively diagnose individual and collective capabilities, and has been awarded the "2016 Service Innovation Award" and the “2016 Global Education Brand Award”.

 

The following six types of competency were conducted in the "Inselllab Business Capability Assessment Project".

1. Workforce & projects Execution Ability

2. Communication & persuasion Ability

3. Creativity & Collaboration Ability

4. Leadership & Coaching Ability

5. Problem solving & Meeting Facilitation Ability

6. Strategic thinking Ability

 

The six assessment types have selected the most important of the abilities required by many companies and organizations at domestic and abroad, and all assessment types have been developed with more sophisticated subdivisions into the following ten areas: .

  

 

Business Competency

Assessment Types Detail

Workforce & Project

Execution  Ability

1. Ability to Manage and Focus on Work         

2. Problem Solving Skills

3. Communication and Listening Skills             

4. Questioning Skills

5. Ability to Plan Work                                

6. Ability to Resolve Work Dispute

7. Ability to Compose and Report Documents   

8. Ability to Collaborate Creativity

9. Ability of Development Ideas                    

10. Ability to Execute Work

Communication &

Persuasion Ability

1. Consultation leading                                

2. Empathy, listening

3. Partner recognition

4. Question to excavate problems

5. Question to excavate needs    

6. Benefit, value, customized solution, and value proposition

7. Resistance prevention                             

8. Distinguish the type of Question

9. Questioning skills for Several Situation        

10. Negotiation Skills

Creativity & Collaboration Ability

1. Creative Thinking Skills                           

2. Creative Connecting Skills

3. Creative Execution Skills                          

4. Creative Communication Skills

5. Creative Questioning Skills                       

6. Creative Problem Solving Skills

7. Creative Idea Development Skill                

8. Creative Ability to Resolve Work Dispute

9. Creative Participation Skill                       

10. Ability to Collaborate Creativity

Problem Solving & Meeting Facilitation Ability

1. Meeting Execution Skills                               

2. Problem Solving Skills

3. Communication and Listening Skills                 

4. Questioning Skills

5. Ability to Resolve Dispute between Participants  

6. Ability to Induce Participate in Discussion

7. Ability to Cooperate Creatively                       

8. Ability of Development Ideas

9. Ability of Achieving Meeting Goal                  

10. Ability to Induce and Execute Meeting Result

Strategic Thinking

Ability

1. Understanding a Business Strategy

2. Conjugating a Business Strategy

3. Analyzing Strategic Environment

4. Understanding Strategic Analysis Frame

5. Developing a Business Strategy

6. Value Creation

7. New market development strategy

8. Blue Ocean Strategy Development

9. Business model analysis and development

10. Understanding the future ICT trends

Leader-Ship &

Coaching Ability

1. Needs Based Motivation & Delegation

2. Giving Feedback to promote the Employee Growth

3. Effective Problem Solving

4. Workforce Management for Productivity

5. Strategy Development for Business Growth

6. Two-way Communication & Empathy

7. Creative Thinking

8. Meeting Facilitation

9. Business Coaching for maximizing Workforce

10. Leading the Future ICT Trends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[C. Inselllab Business Capability Assessment Individual Portfolio Report]

If the applicant has taken a number of Inselllab business Capability assessments in six different types, the results of the assessment is combined into the integrated report with many statistical graphs. The relative comparison between the level and the type of the various assessment types of the applicant, the strengths and weaknesses, and the DB of the sample group of the total in-house applicants are analyzed, and it can be used for the following purposes.

 

 1) In the case of an individual, use it for self-development by using the average, level, strengths and weaknesses of the applicant, comparative data with the same rank, position or all applicants

 

 2) For a team or group of companies, use the average, level, strengths and weaknesses of the team or group, and relative comparisons with all applicants to help team and group members manage, coach, training.

 

 3) For HR, HRD, and HRM, employees can be recruited or evaluated based on the level, strengths, weaknesses, and relative positions of each employee's assessment type and utilize for systematic and customized education, training, and coaching

 

The following graphs show an examples of an individual portfolio report that can be obtained from the Inselllab website if one applicant has completed all six types of capability assessment.

You can also check an individual certificate for each type at any time, and you can also see the sample certificate for it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[D. Conclusion]

             Until now, by analyzing the assessment data of applicant who participated in the ability assessment through the "INSELLLAP Business Capability Assessment Project", the top 20 people are selected and analyzed by various methods to show the statistical graphs that are obtained and explain the implications and insight.

In the case of Top 5 or Top 10, no one got the same ranking as the overall average ranking in six areas of competence, either higher or lower. This implies that the six competencies are not elevated in proportion to one another if they are high, and that they are independent of each other and are not organically related to each other. Of course, there may be a slight organic relationship between competence areas, but it is not a close relationship.

 

In the second analysis report, the data of the applicant's assessment results will be analyzed based on the ranking and relation. In the analysis, all 6 job title were classified as Staff - Assistant Manager - Department Manager - Deputy General Manager - General(Team) Manager - Director.

The results of the analysis will show which job title is the best and which job title is the lowest, and the results of analysis on the strengths and weaknesses of the six competency fields are also disclosed.

 

Among the readers of this article are those who have already experienced the assessment of one or two of INSELLLAP Business Capability Assessment, or those who have experienced all six of them. It would be very meaningful to compare the results described in this report with your own assessment data and to compare your position and level.

 

Individuals or teams who are interested in diagnosing INSELLLAP Business Capability Assessment should contact "jaiwshim@gmail.com".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                           

Grand Prize for

Service Innovation

 


 

 

 The trademarks and copyrights of this document are the property of SB Consulting.

All or any part of the materials, without the permission of

Reuse or duplication in any form is a violation of the law.

For more information or inquiries, please contact

82-10-2397-5734

jaiwshim@gmail.com